2 min read

Considering Cost: Launching a Patient-Reported Outcomes Program

Considering Cost: Launching a Patient-Reported Outcomes Program

Cost-effective technology partnerships are always a top consideration for healthcare organizations, and the COVID-19 pandemic only exacerbated the need for health leaders to spend wisely.

As the collection and measurement of patient-reported outcomes is central to innovative clinical care, health leaders know launching and maintaining a PRO program is essential. The question, however, is how can organizations launch the program cost-effectively?

Cost Considerations for Launching a PRO Program

To holistically consider the cost of a patient-reported outcomes program, health leaders need to explore both the up-front and maintenance expenses required for either building a program internally or partnering with a third-party solution.

Upfront Costs

Up-front costs can be segmented into three primary categories:

  • Program Design: The time and resources required to design an outcomes program that successfully meets the needs of a diverse group of stakeholders.
  • PRO Licenses: Acquiring the necessary licenses to administer patient-reported outcome surveys, such as the PROMIS assessments.
  • Custom EHR Build & Ensuring the IT resources needed to:
    • Build outcome surveys and other custom forms
    • Integrate the program across various EHR modules
    • Build the reporting needed to measure the program’s success
  •  

The size of investment needed to do this effectively is often surprising to healthcare organizations. For example, the Mayo Clinic spent $1.5 million over five years to establish an outcomes program within neurosurgery alone. An enterprise-wide program would be a significantly greater investment.

Maintenance Costs

‍Maintenance costs are difficult to quantify on the front-end and, as a result, these costs are often understated or occasionally neglected entirely. However, regardless of the investment made on the front-end of launching an outcomes program, there will always be future maintenance. These maintenance costs most commonly stem from the need to

  • Modify Existing Workflows: Once the program has been deployed, healthcare providers and administration will inevitably identify ways to improve upon what has been built to unlock incremental value.

  • Create New Workflows / Order Sets: As described above, organizations often need to create new workflows or order sets. Expanding the program to better target a patient       population with a specific diagnosis or prescribed treatment enables the organization to create a more personalized experience for the patient and unlocks valuable insights for the organization.

  • Enhance Business Intelligence: Most organizations wish to continue to enhance reporting and dashboard capabilities to generate easy-to-consume and actionable insights. This level of customization can be costly.

Other Considerations

Cost is only one factor to deciding whether to deploy a PRO program internally or through the use of a third-party solution. Other considerations include:

  • Speed to deployment
  • Scalability
  • Technical Requirements and expertise

We explore these considerations in the white paper, “Build vs. Buy: Launching an Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes Program."

Looking to Launch a PRO Program? 6 Must-See Stats

Looking to Launch a PRO Program? 6 Must-See Stats

The value of collecting and measuring patient-reported outcomes is undisputed– from improving quality of care delivery to optimizing operations and...

Read More
Top Tips to Improve PRO Patient Compliance

Top Tips to Improve PRO Patient Compliance

While patient-reported outcomes are increasingly recognized as essential for delivering patient-centric care, they require generating high compliance...

Read More
How MU Health Care Prioritizes Patient Compliance in Patient-Reported Outcome Collection

How MU Health Care Prioritizes Patient Compliance in Patient-Reported Outcome Collection

The ability to leverage patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data is directly dependent upon patient participation. If patients do not self-report, the...

Read More